Making telecom integrations reliable
My work connects diagnosis to delivery: restoring production responses, checking migrations in a repeatable local environment, and giving colleagues the examples and runbooks they need to operate the integration.
- Responsibility
- Diagnosis, fixes, testing and delivery handover
- Stack
- Java · WSO2 · SOAP / REST · Docker · WireMock
- Scope
- Production recovery · customer UAT · local and lab checks
Production response recovery
An asynchronous response-delivery path failed in production when SOAP metadata probes and a missing callback address interacted with endpoint suspension. I traced the failure across request handling, callback routing and endpoint state.
I prepared fixes at each boundary and supplied a conservative correction alongside an optional refactor. Staging checks and rollback guidance gave the delivery team a bounded path to rollout.
The fixes were deployed and restored response delivery in production.
A separate UAT regression
During customer UAT, a qualification API assembled its response but failed to send it. An internal data-service call had overwritten the outgoing HTTP status. An apparent installation fix did not resolve that separate response-path problem.
I gathered logs, installed versions and configuration through a delivery colleague. AI-assisted code comparison helped investigate the paths; I checked explanations against runtime evidence and supplied corrected sequences that restore the intended status at the response boundary.
The delivery colleague applied the correction and confirmed that synchronous qualification responses worked on retest. This was preproduction validation before go-live.
Repeatable integration checks
I built a Docker environment containing the integration logic, with WireMock simulating the downstream backend. It let me repeat local checks during an ESB-to-Micro Integrator migration without a full provisioning platform.
For OAuth token rollover, I reproduced an endpoint-wiring problem and verified replacement tokens, overlapping validity and rejection of the old token at its original expiry in a test environment.
Safer upgrades and handovers
I hardened upgrade and lifecycle handling to preserve certificates, avoid stale installation layouts and limit process control to the intended installation. Those changes were verified in a lab. Migration delivery also included release bundles, cutover steps and rollback runbooks.
I mentored junior engineers through WSO2 walkthroughs, worked SOAP examples and implementation feedback, then supported knowledge handover to another developer.
Explore the UAT response path
Response state, step by step
Simplified example with synthetic data.
Not a replay of a customer system.
- 01Customer systemSubmit qualification request
- 02Downstream serviceReturn the business result
- 03Integration layerBuild the outgoing response
- 04Internal data-service callChanges the outgoing HTTP status
- 05Response boundarySend the response to the caller
- Business result
- Pending
- Response body
- Not built
- HTTP status
- Not set
- Delivery
- Waiting
The caller asks whether a service can be provided. The response still needs to be assembled.